I don't know have you ever glimpsed the movement of thought in the brain?  It is very bizarre. There is a mutitude of diverse images in a vast crazy activity.   It is impossible to make sense of it. It is this immediate perception of all of this mixed packets of life, intensely active, out of control, in chaos, which I  guess at attempting to make sense of,  or to relate to in some way, and that is terrifying.  While seeing the mass of moving images,  it is like there is an instinct for…

"As long as there is a time interval between the observer and the observed it creates friction and therefore there is a waste of energy. That energy is gathered to its highest point when the observer is the observed, in which there is no time interval at all. Then there will be energy without motive and it will find its own channel of action because then the 'I' does not exist.

Freedom from the Known,120

“And so long as you haven't experienced

this: to die and so to grow,

you are only a troubled guest

on the dark earth.”

     Goethe

She walked around at the end of her life,…

I got this fortune cookie the other night at a Chinese restaurant.

First I thought "fortune=future, finding is time-binding."

Then I thought "Find the truth in time!"

Not "in time" like "before it's too late" but "in time" like "actually as it happens in time."

K might say time is psychological, that's the truth of it, and thus the timeless is when thought/becoming ends.

I say also, if you move in time with time, as…

The “I” is the past, therefore it is the known. “Freedom from the known” is freedom from the “I”. You are the content of your consciousness, of what you can know, which implies again the “I” which is the “I” of all the different/various fragments of “you”, of “your” memories, of everything “you” like/dislike. If you cannot say “I” for all these different fragments, you will not be able to free yourself from these fragments, from the known, from the “I”. If one of the fragments dominates the…

In the universities they expect you to be intelligent within their own frame work of what they call "ethics" and intelligence is graded as A student or B student and so on. Krishnamurti denies the academic intelligence as being limited and therefore not intelligence at all.

The re-doubtable Deepak Chopra quoted the following exchange, which I have not been able to find in the authentic transcripts:

Questioner: "The more I listen to you, the more I think you're an atheist."

Krishnamurti: "I was an atheist before I realized I was God."

Does anyone know more about this alleged quote?

 To have that statement printed clearly on those blogs by the administration or the technical people is needed.

There is no objection to the option to have blogs that only your friends can comment on . 

The problem is for example some one spends 10 minuets to compose a paragraph not  having a clue  that there is a pre-condition in this blog and no one knows it except the blogger himself( sneaky). This is a  wastage of energy   of the readers of the blogs that can be prevented…

funny how the more you Love someone the more incapable you can be of expressing it

>Therese

haha

>Dude

>kind of a bitchy thing to say

>Therese

>good point

>Dude

>so what was your goal in leaving that comment....just to say something shitty? Way to continue acting like a teenage girl. Grow up.  I'ts sad i have to tell a supposedly grown woman to be respectful and not act…

Throw in the cards.  JK wins!  Throw his book across the room or at least put it down with no intention of picking it up again.  I fold. JK has a flush.  

Readers of nonfiction have an affinity with intellect because nothing sits more uneasy on the mind than unreasonableness.  The heart will overlook it.  You're so cute when you're mad.  And yes I do mean that intellect is necessarily reasonable.  This is why JK insists emphatically on sensitivity, that true intelligence…